Currently (re-)reading: Blood Bound by Patricia Briggs
Wednesday, 12 October 2011 06:04 amNote type thingie: I have a format for book reviews and such, sure, but I'm all hopped up on cold medicine, so I'll edit that in later, m'kay?
Fans of Laurell K. Hamilton's Anita Blake: Vampire Hunter series will happily tell you that she invented the paranormal romance genre. That's always struck me as very silly, as any book containing vampires was likely to contain some eroticism already, and the series in question started out as paranormal mystery.
I will buy that it helped immensely that Hamilton's series was already popular and well-established when it jumped from paranormal mystery to paranormal romance, and her timing--she made the switch just in time to pants that zeitgeist--was perfect to become its poster author. I'll even agree that she's the source of the now ubiquitous vamp/were/kinda-human love triangle, and thus most books in the genre owe Anita Blake a huge debt of gratitude.
(I'll also grumble about losing the plot, characterization thrown out the window, and authors who get too close to fandom and end up writing what is essentially fanfic of their own series...)
One series in which the influence of Anita Blake is obvious is the Mercy Thompson series by Patricia Briggs. I have the warm and fuzzies for this series, because even if Briggs didn't set out to do so, it feels like a former fan's attempt to write an Anita-like series without the more annoying Anita-isms.
The way Hamilton brought whole books to a halt to describe Anita's latest outfit, down to the Nikes with color coordinated swooshes? Mercy throws on yesterday's T-shirt, mustard stain and all.
The way Hamilton always had to have her necromancer Blake level-up, one-up and out-badass the monsters, even when it didn't make sense and left her painted into a corner? Mercy is a relatively weak shapeshifter surrounded by things that would normally kill her; she gets by because she's very good at being strategically submissive, generally unobtrusive, and in the right place at the right time.
The way early Anita was judgmentally prudish, untilHamilton remarried that pesky ardeur suddenly required her to screw everybody that crossed her path? It's nonchalantly suggested that Mercy has a social life, with no sexual hang-ups that require supernatural justification or a sex scene every 2.3 pages.
The way Hamilton is squicky about homosexuality, and so not only did all males have to swoon over Anita, but they were forbidden to bed each other? Briggs' gay werewolf is just a friend, there are social implications to this within the story beyond, "So, that means he doesn't have sex with the heroine then?" and like most of the other characters, he's happily tied up in his own relationship.
The way Hamilton forgets to include any goddamn plot once she gets into that 'sex scene every 2.3 pages' run of books? I've not hit the latest Mercy books, but as far as I've read, the series is still mystery with some romance and sex, and even when Mercy gets laid, other shit still happens.
This may be a sticky point particular to fans of the early Anita books. Hamilton once swore she'd never include gratuitous sex, and then declared later that the constant sexin' wasn't gratuitous because they were plot, while simultaneously declaring that she didn't write smut. I have no problem with smut (downright fond of it, I am), but let us be honest with each other: you need plot in a story, and if sex is the plot, then it's smut. And, alas, the same way some people can read Stephen King's horror books but not his I'm a serious author books, or Anne Rice's vampire soap opera books but not her whip me! spank me!romance novels, I'm quite fond of Hamilton's mysteries, but I cannot stand the way the woman writes a sex scene. Her smut is not my kind of smut.
Where Hamilton ever admits it to herself, Anita Blake: Vampire Slayer and Anita Blake: Vampire Layer are completely different genres, and the difference is palpable in the writing itself. Mercy Thompson stays Mercy Thompson, whether she's getting smacked around, getting laid, or having flashbacks to a bad thing that tried to kill her.
(The way Anita's constant leveling up meant she never had to break down and wig out when she should have full-blown PTSD by now? Yeah, fixed that one, too.)
Fans of Laurell K. Hamilton's Anita Blake: Vampire Hunter series will happily tell you that she invented the paranormal romance genre. That's always struck me as very silly, as any book containing vampires was likely to contain some eroticism already, and the series in question started out as paranormal mystery.
I will buy that it helped immensely that Hamilton's series was already popular and well-established when it jumped from paranormal mystery to paranormal romance, and her timing--she made the switch just in time to pants that zeitgeist--was perfect to become its poster author. I'll even agree that she's the source of the now ubiquitous vamp/were/kinda-human love triangle, and thus most books in the genre owe Anita Blake a huge debt of gratitude.
(I'll also grumble about losing the plot, characterization thrown out the window, and authors who get too close to fandom and end up writing what is essentially fanfic of their own series...)
One series in which the influence of Anita Blake is obvious is the Mercy Thompson series by Patricia Briggs. I have the warm and fuzzies for this series, because even if Briggs didn't set out to do so, it feels like a former fan's attempt to write an Anita-like series without the more annoying Anita-isms.
The way Hamilton brought whole books to a halt to describe Anita's latest outfit, down to the Nikes with color coordinated swooshes? Mercy throws on yesterday's T-shirt, mustard stain and all.
The way Hamilton always had to have her necromancer Blake level-up, one-up and out-badass the monsters, even when it didn't make sense and left her painted into a corner? Mercy is a relatively weak shapeshifter surrounded by things that would normally kill her; she gets by because she's very good at being strategically submissive, generally unobtrusive, and in the right place at the right time.
The way early Anita was judgmentally prudish, until
The way Hamilton is squicky about homosexuality, and so not only did all males have to swoon over Anita, but they were forbidden to bed each other? Briggs' gay werewolf is just a friend, there are social implications to this within the story beyond, "So, that means he doesn't have sex with the heroine then?" and like most of the other characters, he's happily tied up in his own relationship.
The way Hamilton forgets to include any goddamn plot once she gets into that 'sex scene every 2.3 pages' run of books? I've not hit the latest Mercy books, but as far as I've read, the series is still mystery with some romance and sex, and even when Mercy gets laid, other shit still happens.
This may be a sticky point particular to fans of the early Anita books. Hamilton once swore she'd never include gratuitous sex, and then declared later that the constant sexin' wasn't gratuitous because they were plot, while simultaneously declaring that she didn't write smut. I have no problem with smut (downright fond of it, I am), but let us be honest with each other: you need plot in a story, and if sex is the plot, then it's smut. And, alas, the same way some people can read Stephen King's horror books but not his I'm a serious author books, or Anne Rice's vampire soap opera books but not her whip me! spank me!romance novels, I'm quite fond of Hamilton's mysteries, but I cannot stand the way the woman writes a sex scene. Her smut is not my kind of smut.
Where Hamilton ever admits it to herself, Anita Blake: Vampire Slayer and Anita Blake: Vampire Layer are completely different genres, and the difference is palpable in the writing itself. Mercy Thompson stays Mercy Thompson, whether she's getting smacked around, getting laid, or having flashbacks to a bad thing that tried to kill her.
(The way Anita's constant leveling up meant she never had to break down and wig out when she should have full-blown PTSD by now? Yeah, fixed that one, too.)