Horror as social commentary
Saturday, 8 October 2011 09:19 amThe most common criticism levelled against the horror genre--and the most inaccurate--is that it's 'empty calories.' It rarely contains social commentary or depth, at best it's just bugs on strings and cats jumping from shadowy corners, and at worst it's sex, blood and gore.
So, so wrong. To get under our skin, horror almost has to include social commentary, in order to touch on what really unnerves us.
For example, put Dracula in context: England's growing population of Eastern European immigrants, increasingly vocal suffragettes and feminists, and homosexuality something of an open secret. Who was Dracula meant to frighten? Figure that out and suddenly it's no mystery why vampires became romantic heroes in later fiction, and why young women so eagerly embrace the monster.
If you find the Other and identify the story's ideal audience, you can start to tug loose the threads of social commentary.
( Oh, the spoilers you will see! )
So, so wrong. To get under our skin, horror almost has to include social commentary, in order to touch on what really unnerves us.
For example, put Dracula in context: England's growing population of Eastern European immigrants, increasingly vocal suffragettes and feminists, and homosexuality something of an open secret. Who was Dracula meant to frighten? Figure that out and suddenly it's no mystery why vampires became romantic heroes in later fiction, and why young women so eagerly embrace the monster.
If you find the Other and identify the story's ideal audience, you can start to tug loose the threads of social commentary.
( Oh, the spoilers you will see! )